防詐3要訣：不聽信、不操作、掛斷電話 
內容簡介
In the Chinese language, morphologically complex words have been attested since the remote past of the language, including both stem-modifying processes and agglutination of morphemes, mostly lexical and free in the classical language (see Baxter & Sagart 1998). Chinese word-formation has received much attention in the literature in recent times, but most descriptions and theoretical work on the topic are focussed on compounding (see e.g. Packard 1998, 2000, Lin 2001, Ceccagno & Basciano 2009a-b), and it is still a matter of debate whether compounding and derivation are two distinct phenomena in Modern Mandarin Chinese (see, among others, Pan, Ye & Han 2004).
In this monograph we intend to analyse Chinese word formation patterns which may be candidate to derivational status, according to the definition of such process of word formation which we find in the morphological literature (as e.g. Beard 1998, Naumann & Vogel 2000, Olsen 2000): they are patterns such as X—學 ‘the study of X’ (心理學xinlixue ‘psychology’) or X—性 'the property of (being) X’( 重要性 zhongyaoxing ‘importance’). The characteristics of the morphemes around which those patterns are built which sets them close to derivational affixes are that they appear in a fixed position, seem to form new words productively and convey a different, “emptier” meaning than that of the corresponding lexical morph (see Ma 1995). The apparent phonological (and, needless to say, orthographical) identity between a “would-be affix” and its lexical counterpart (as, say, 學 used as a verb, ‘to study’) is not surprising, since grammaticalization without alteration in the sound shape of a morph is a characteristic feature of languages belonging to the East and South-East Asian area (Bisang 1996, 2004). Therefore, the notion of “affixoid”, coined to describe word formation elements in European languages which are bound but phonologically identical to a free form in the language (such as Dutch boer, meaning ‘farmer’ as a word and ‘dealer’ when used as a bound form), proves to be unnecessary for Chinese.
In this monograph we intend to analyse Chinese word formation patterns which may be candidate to derivational status, according to the definition of such process of word formation which we find in the morphological literature (as e.g. Beard 1998, Naumann & Vogel 2000, Olsen 2000): they are patterns such as X—學 ‘the study of X’ (心理學xinlixue ‘psychology’) or X—性 'the property of (being) X’( 重要性 zhongyaoxing ‘importance’). The characteristics of the morphemes around which those patterns are built which sets them close to derivational affixes are that they appear in a fixed position, seem to form new words productively and convey a different, “emptier” meaning than that of the corresponding lexical morph (see Ma 1995). The apparent phonological (and, needless to say, orthographical) identity between a “would-be affix” and its lexical counterpart (as, say, 學 used as a verb, ‘to study’) is not surprising, since grammaticalization without alteration in the sound shape of a morph is a characteristic feature of languages belonging to the East and South-East Asian area (Bisang 1996, 2004). Therefore, the notion of “affixoid”, coined to describe word formation elements in European languages which are bound but phonologically identical to a free form in the language (such as Dutch boer, meaning ‘farmer’ as a word and ‘dealer’ when used as a bound form), proves to be unnecessary for Chinese.
產品目錄
TABLE OF CONTENTS
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS………..……………………………………..V
ABSTRACT ............................................................................................ VII
LIST OF TABLES .................................................................................... X
LIST OF FIGURES ................................................................................. XI
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS ................................................................ XII
PREFACE .............................................................................................XIII
CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION: THE CHINESE LANGUAGE,
DERIVATION AND GRAMMATICALIZATION THEORY ............. 1
1.1 ON THE SUBJECT OF OUR STUDY: MANDARIN CHINESE...................... 1
1.1.1 What is „Mandarin Chinese‟? ....................................................... 1
1.1.2 The Phonology of Standard Modern Mandarin ............................ 4
1.1.3 Aspects of Mandarin Morphology and Syntax ............................. 5
1.1.4 The Chinese Script ........................................................................ 9
1.2 DERIVATION IN WORD FORMATION ................................................... 10
1.2.1 Lexical Derivation ....................................................................... 14
1.2.2 Derivation and Compounding: Delimiting the Borders ............. 17
1.3 DERIVATION AND GRAMMATICALIZATION ......................................... 32
1.3.1 Lexical Derivation and Grammaticalization ............................... 34
1.3.1.1 The „Parameters of Grammaticalization‟ ........................... 39
1.3.1.2 Grammaticalization and „bleaching‟ .................................. 46
1.3.1.3 Grammaticalization and lexicalization ............................... 59
1.3.2 Grammaticalization in East and South-East Asian Languages .. 62
1.3.2.1 Comparing „Western‟ and „Eastern‟ grammaticalization
phenomena .................................................................................... 69
1.3.2.1 Affixoids reconsidered ..................................................... 77
CHAPTER 2 PREVIOUS TREATMENTS OF LEXICAL
DERIVATION IN CHINESE LINGUISTICS ..................................... 81
2.1 SOME KEY NOTIONS OF MORPHOLOGY IN CHINESE LINGUISTICS .... 81
2.1.1 The notion of „morpheme‟ and related issues ............................. 81
2.1.2 „Root‟ vs. „Affix‟, „Derivation‟ vs. „Compounding‟ .................. 89
2.2 LEXICAL DERIVATION IN CHINESE LINGUISTICS ................................ 96
2.2.1 Overview ...................................................................................... 96
2.2.2 Recent works.............................................................................. 101
2.2.3 Summary .................................................................................... 112
CHAPTER 3 DERIVATION OR COMPOUNDING? THE
MANDARIN CASE .............................................................................. 113
3.1 THE BOUNDARY BEYWEEN DERIVATION AND COMPOUNDING IN
MODERN MANDARIN CHINESE ............................................................... 113
3.1.1 Methodological Issues ............................................................... 113
3.1.2 Our Sample ................................................................................ 114
3.2 ANALYSIS OF THE SAMPLE ................................................................ 117
3.2.1 Class Nouns in East and South-East Asian Languages ............ 117
3.2.1.1 Some Remarks on the Role of Japanese on the Development
of Chinese Word Formation ........................................................ 124
3.2.1.2 Concluding Remarks on Class Nouns ............................... 136
3.2.2 Some „Newly-coined Affixes‟: on Analogy and Productivity . 142
3.2.3 „Chinese‟ vs.‟European‟ affixes? .............................................. 158
3.2.4 Between Morphology and Syntax: ‒者 –zhě and ‒式 ‒shì .... 167
3.2.5 Two models for prefixation ....................................................... 184
3.3 SUMMARY AND CONCLUDING REMARKS ......................................... 200
CHAPTER 4 CONCLUSION .............................................................. 203
4.1 LEXICAL DERIVATION IN GRAMMATICALIZATION THEORY ............ 203
4.2 „INNER‟ AND „OUTER‟ FORCES DRIVING THE EVOLUTION OF CHINESE
WORD FORMATION .................................................................................. 204
4.3 LEXICAL DERIVATION AS A CROSS-LINGUISTICALLY VALID
CATEGORY ............................................................................................... 206
4.4 SUGGESTED AREAS FOR FURTHER RESEARCH ................................. 207
BIBLIOGRAPHY ................................................................................. 210
LIST OF TABLES
Table 1.1 The parameters of grammaticalization (Lehmann 1995) ............ 39
Table 2.1 A classification of Chinese morphemes (Dong X. 2004) ............ 86
Table 2.2 A classification of Chinese morphemes (Packard 2000)............. 88
Table 2.3 Affixes and affixoids in Pan, Ye & Han (2004) ......................... 97
Table 3.1 Our sample ............................................................................... 116
Table 3.2 The evolution of syllable structure in the history of Chinese .... 125
Table 3.3 Complex nouns with 學 xué as the head in Masini (1993) and in
NXCD (2005) ..................................................................... 134
Table 3.4 Sample of words containing 吧 bā as the right-hand constituent
(from Arcodia 2011) ........................................................... 146
Table 3.5 Prefixes, prefixoids and related categories in nine sources (Xu &
Cai 2007, Yang Y. 2007) .................................................... 186
Table 4.1 Inflection, derivation and compounding: salient formal and
semantic features ................................................................. 206
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 3.1 The minimal syllable in Old Chinese (ca. 1000 BCE) and
Middle Chinese (ca. 800 CE) ................................................ 127
Figure 3.2 Radial network for 吧 bā ..................................................... 151
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS………..……………………………………..V
ABSTRACT ............................................................................................ VII
LIST OF TABLES .................................................................................... X
LIST OF FIGURES ................................................................................. XI
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS ................................................................ XII
PREFACE .............................................................................................XIII
CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION: THE CHINESE LANGUAGE,
DERIVATION AND GRAMMATICALIZATION THEORY ............. 1
1.1 ON THE SUBJECT OF OUR STUDY: MANDARIN CHINESE...................... 1
1.1.1 What is „Mandarin Chinese‟? ....................................................... 1
1.1.2 The Phonology of Standard Modern Mandarin ............................ 4
1.1.3 Aspects of Mandarin Morphology and Syntax ............................. 5
1.1.4 The Chinese Script ........................................................................ 9
1.2 DERIVATION IN WORD FORMATION ................................................... 10
1.2.1 Lexical Derivation ....................................................................... 14
1.2.2 Derivation and Compounding: Delimiting the Borders ............. 17
1.3 DERIVATION AND GRAMMATICALIZATION ......................................... 32
1.3.1 Lexical Derivation and Grammaticalization ............................... 34
1.3.1.1 The „Parameters of Grammaticalization‟ ........................... 39
1.3.1.2 Grammaticalization and „bleaching‟ .................................. 46
1.3.1.3 Grammaticalization and lexicalization ............................... 59
1.3.2 Grammaticalization in East and South-East Asian Languages .. 62
1.3.2.1 Comparing „Western‟ and „Eastern‟ grammaticalization
phenomena .................................................................................... 69
1.3.2.1 Affixoids reconsidered ..................................................... 77
CHAPTER 2 PREVIOUS TREATMENTS OF LEXICAL
DERIVATION IN CHINESE LINGUISTICS ..................................... 81
2.1 SOME KEY NOTIONS OF MORPHOLOGY IN CHINESE LINGUISTICS .... 81
2.1.1 The notion of „morpheme‟ and related issues ............................. 81
2.1.2 „Root‟ vs. „Affix‟, „Derivation‟ vs. „Compounding‟ .................. 89
2.2 LEXICAL DERIVATION IN CHINESE LINGUISTICS ................................ 96
2.2.1 Overview ...................................................................................... 96
2.2.2 Recent works.............................................................................. 101
2.2.3 Summary .................................................................................... 112
CHAPTER 3 DERIVATION OR COMPOUNDING? THE
MANDARIN CASE .............................................................................. 113
3.1 THE BOUNDARY BEYWEEN DERIVATION AND COMPOUNDING IN
MODERN MANDARIN CHINESE ............................................................... 113
3.1.1 Methodological Issues ............................................................... 113
3.1.2 Our Sample ................................................................................ 114
3.2 ANALYSIS OF THE SAMPLE ................................................................ 117
3.2.1 Class Nouns in East and South-East Asian Languages ............ 117
3.2.1.1 Some Remarks on the Role of Japanese on the Development
of Chinese Word Formation ........................................................ 124
3.2.1.2 Concluding Remarks on Class Nouns ............................... 136
3.2.2 Some „Newly-coined Affixes‟: on Analogy and Productivity . 142
3.2.3 „Chinese‟ vs.‟European‟ affixes? .............................................. 158
3.2.4 Between Morphology and Syntax: ‒者 –zhě and ‒式 ‒shì .... 167
3.2.5 Two models for prefixation ....................................................... 184
3.3 SUMMARY AND CONCLUDING REMARKS ......................................... 200
CHAPTER 4 CONCLUSION .............................................................. 203
4.1 LEXICAL DERIVATION IN GRAMMATICALIZATION THEORY ............ 203
4.2 „INNER‟ AND „OUTER‟ FORCES DRIVING THE EVOLUTION OF CHINESE
WORD FORMATION .................................................................................. 204
4.3 LEXICAL DERIVATION AS A CROSS-LINGUISTICALLY VALID
CATEGORY ............................................................................................... 206
4.4 SUGGESTED AREAS FOR FURTHER RESEARCH ................................. 207
BIBLIOGRAPHY ................................................................................. 210
LIST OF TABLES
Table 1.1 The parameters of grammaticalization (Lehmann 1995) ............ 39
Table 2.1 A classification of Chinese morphemes (Dong X. 2004) ............ 86
Table 2.2 A classification of Chinese morphemes (Packard 2000)............. 88
Table 2.3 Affixes and affixoids in Pan, Ye & Han (2004) ......................... 97
Table 3.1 Our sample ............................................................................... 116
Table 3.2 The evolution of syllable structure in the history of Chinese .... 125
Table 3.3 Complex nouns with 學 xué as the head in Masini (1993) and in
NXCD (2005) ..................................................................... 134
Table 3.4 Sample of words containing 吧 bā as the right-hand constituent
(from Arcodia 2011) ........................................................... 146
Table 3.5 Prefixes, prefixoids and related categories in nine sources (Xu &
Cai 2007, Yang Y. 2007) .................................................... 186
Table 4.1 Inflection, derivation and compounding: salient formal and
semantic features ................................................................. 206
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 3.1 The minimal syllable in Old Chinese (ca. 1000 BCE) and
Middle Chinese (ca. 800 CE) ................................................ 127
Figure 3.2 Radial network for 吧 bā ..................................................... 151
規格
誠品貨碼 / 2681919076003
ISBN13 / 9789861475233
ISBN10 / 9861475230
EAN貨碼 / 9789861475233
頁數 / 226
裝訂 / P:平裝
語言 / 1:中文/繁體
尺寸 / 23X17X1.4CM
級別 / N:無
退貨說明
退貨須知：
- 依照消費者保護法的規定，您享有商品貨到次日起七天猶豫期(含例假日)的權益(請注意！猶豫期非試用期)，辦理退貨之商品必須是全新狀態(不得有刮傷、破損、受潮)且需完整(包含全部商品、配件、原廠內外包裝、贈品及所有附隨文件或資料的完整性等)。
- 請您以送貨廠商使用之包裝紙箱將退貨商品包裝妥當，若原紙箱已遺失，請另使用其他紙箱包覆於商品原廠包裝之外，切勿直接於原廠包裝上黏貼紙張或書寫文字。若原廠包裝損毀將可能被認定為已逾越檢查商品之必要程度，本公司得依毀損程度扣除回復原狀必要費用(整新費)後退費；請您先確認商品正確、外觀可接受，再行拆封，以免影響您的權利；若為產品瑕疵，本公司接受退貨。
依「通訊交易解除權合理例外情事適用準則」，下列商品不適用七日猶豫期，除產品本身有瑕疵外，不接受退貨：
- 易於腐敗、保存期限較短或解約時即將逾期。(如:生鮮蔬果、乳製品、冷凍冷藏食材、蛋糕)
- 依消費者要求所為之客製化給付。(如:客製印章、鋼筆刻字)
- 報紙、期刊或雜誌。
- 經消費者拆封之影音商品或電腦軟體。
- 非以有形媒介提供之數位內容或一經提供即為完成之線上服務，經消費者事先同意始提供。(如:電子書)
- 已拆封之個人衛生用品。(如:內衣褲、襪類、褲襪、刮鬍刀、除毛刀等貼身用品)
- 國際航空客運服務。
若您退貨時有下列情形，可能被認定已逾越檢查商品之必要程度而須負擔為回復原狀必要費用(整新費)，或影響您的退貨權利，請您在拆封前決定是否要退貨：
- 以數位或電磁紀錄形式儲存或著作權相關之商品(包含但不限於CD、VCD、DVD、電腦軟體等) 包裝已拆封者(除運送用之包裝以外)。
- 耗材(包含但不限於墨水匣、碳粉匣、紙張、筆類墨水、清潔劑補充包等)之商品包裝已拆封者(除運送用之包裝以外)。
- 衣飾鞋類/寢具/織品(包含但不限於衣褲、鞋子、襪子、泳裝、床單、被套、填充玩具)或之商品缺件(含購買商品、附件、內外包裝、贈品等)或經剪標或下水或商品有不可回復之髒污或磨損痕跡。
- 食品、美容/保養用品、內衣褲等消耗性或個人衛生用品、商品銷售頁面上特別載明之商品已拆封者(除運送用之包裝外一切包裝、包括但不限於瓶蓋、封口、封膜等接觸商品內容之包裝部分)或已非全新狀態(外觀有刮傷、破損、受潮等)與包裝不完整(缺少商品、附件、原廠外盒、保護袋、配件紙箱、保麗龍、隨貨文件、贈品等)。
- 家電、3C、畫作、電子閱讀器等商品，除商品本身有瑕疵外，退回之商品已拆封(除運送用之包裝外一切包裝、包括但不限於封膜等接觸商品內容之包裝部分、移除封條、拆除吊牌、拆除貼膠或標籤等情形)或已非全新狀態(外觀有刮傷、破損、受潮等)與包裝不完整(缺少商品、附件、原廠外盒、保護袋、配件紙箱、保麗龍、隨貨文件、贈品等)。
- 退貨程序請參閱【客服專區→常見問題→誠品線上退貨退款】之說明。
付款/配送