防詐3要訣：不聽信、不操作、掛斷電話 
The Electoral College 4 Dummmies: Would it be better to simply count the popular vote?
ELECTORAL COL 4 DUMMMIES
內容簡介
In this book, you will learn about the purpose of the Electoral College and be able to come to your own conclusions about whether the Founders were all wet in the late 1700's and we now need to revert back to the popular vote. In 2016, Hillary Clinton won the Popular vote yet Donald Trump won the presidency. Therefore, many of the political left are crying foul. In 2000, when George Bush was elected president without winning the popular vote the same cry was heard.Neither of these were as bad as in 1824, when John Quincy Adams was elected president despite not winning either the popular vote or the electoral vote. How could this be? Andrew Jackson was the clear winner in both categories. Jackson's popular vote total was 38,000 more than Adams. Moreover, Jackson beat Adams in the electoral vote 99 to 84. Despite being victorious, Jackson did no win the presidency. Why?Andrew Jackson did not reach the majority 131 votes needed in the Electoral College to be declared president. Neither candidate did. So, what happened? The decision was made by the House of Representatives. It was the House-the People's Representatives, which voted Adams into the White House. There were only two other stories like these. In 1876, Rutherford B. Hayes won the election by a margin of just one electoral vote; but he lost the popular vote by more than 250,000 ballots to Samuel J. Tilden. In 1888, Benjamin Harrison received 233 electoral votes to Grover Cleveland's 168, winning the presidency. Harrison lost the popular vote by more than 90,000 votes.Why is this? When U.S. citizens go to the polls to "elect" a president, they are in fact voting for a particular slate of electors, though they vote for a properly named presidential candidate. In almost every state, the candidate who wins the most votes (that is, a plurality) in the state receives all the state's electoral votes. These are electoral votes based on the popular votes. Why is this? You bought this book to find out. Is it a good or is it a bad idea? Is there any rhyme or reason to it? Were the Founders out on a bender the night before they made this decision or was the Electoral College a stroke of genius?This is your best book to discover the answer and for understanding the current system and other possible systems to determine the presidency fairly. Just because powerful people choose to ignore our rights and freedoms does not mean we must endure tyranny. The first step of course is to understand the most basic written precepts in the Constitution. Understanding the role of the Electoral College in our Constitution is of prime importance. Reading this book is a must.
作者介紹
Brian W. Kelly retired as an Assistant Professor in the Business Information Technology (BIT) program at Marywood University, where he also served as the IBM i and midrange systems technical advisor to the IT faculty. Kelly designed, developed, and taught many college and professional courses. He is a contributing technical editor to a number of IT industry magazines. On the Patriotic side, you can find many of Kelly's articles on www.brianwkelly.com. Kelly is a former IBM Senior Systems Engineer and he has been a candidate for US Congress and the US Senate from Pennsylvania. He has an active information technology consultancy. He is the author of 95 books and numerous articles. Ask Brian to speak at your next rally! You would enjoy his frank perspectives! Over the past twenty years, Brian Kelly has become one of America's most outspoken and eloquent conservative / nationalist protagonists. Brian loves America. Besides The Electoral College 4 Dummmies, Kelly is also the author of many other patriotic books. Check them out at www.Amazon.com/author/bria
規格
退貨說明
退貨須知：
- 依照消費者保護法的規定，您享有商品貨到次日起七天猶豫期(含例假日)的權益(請注意！猶豫期非試用期)，辦理退貨之商品必須是全新狀態(不得有刮傷、破損、受潮)且需完整(包含全部商品、配件、原廠內外包裝、贈品及所有附隨文件或資料的完整性等)。
- 請您以送貨廠商使用之包裝紙箱將退貨商品包裝妥當，若原紙箱已遺失，請另使用其他紙箱包覆於商品原廠包裝之外，切勿直接於原廠包裝上黏貼紙張或書寫文字。若原廠包裝損毀將可能被認定為已逾越檢查商品之必要程度，本公司得依毀損程度扣除回復原狀必要費用(整新費)後退費；請您先確認商品正確、外觀可接受，再行拆封，以免影響您的權利；若為產品瑕疵，本公司接受退貨。
依「通訊交易解除權合理例外情事適用準則」，下列商品不適用七日猶豫期，除產品本身有瑕疵外，不接受退貨：
- 易於腐敗、保存期限較短或解約時即將逾期。(如:生鮮蔬果、乳製品、冷凍冷藏食材、蛋糕)
- 依消費者要求所為之客製化給付。(如:客製印章、鋼筆刻字)
- 報紙、期刊或雜誌。
- 經消費者拆封之影音商品或電腦軟體。
- 非以有形媒介提供之數位內容或一經提供即為完成之線上服務，經消費者事先同意始提供。(如:電子書)
- 已拆封之個人衛生用品。(如:內衣褲、襪類、褲襪、刮鬍刀、除毛刀等貼身用品)
- 國際航空客運服務。
若您退貨時有下列情形，可能被認定已逾越檢查商品之必要程度而須負擔為回復原狀必要費用(整新費)，或影響您的退貨權利，請您在拆封前決定是否要退貨：
- 以數位或電磁紀錄形式儲存或著作權相關之商品(包含但不限於CD、VCD、DVD、電腦軟體等) 包裝已拆封者(除運送用之包裝以外)。
- 耗材(包含但不限於墨水匣、碳粉匣、紙張、筆類墨水、清潔劑補充包等)之商品包裝已拆封者(除運送用之包裝以外)。
- 衣飾鞋類/寢具/織品(包含但不限於衣褲、鞋子、襪子、泳裝、床單、被套、填充玩具)或之商品缺件(含購買商品、附件、內外包裝、贈品等)或經剪標或下水或商品有不可回復之髒污或磨損痕跡。
- 食品、美容/保養用品、內衣褲等消耗性或個人衛生用品、商品銷售頁面上特別載明之商品已拆封者(除運送用之包裝外一切包裝、包括但不限於瓶蓋、封口、封膜等接觸商品內容之包裝部分)或已非全新狀態(外觀有刮傷、破損、受潮等)與包裝不完整(缺少商品、附件、原廠外盒、保護袋、配件紙箱、保麗龍、隨貨文件、贈品等)。
- 家電、3C、畫作、電子閱讀器等商品，除商品本身有瑕疵外，退回之商品已拆封(除運送用之包裝外一切包裝、包括但不限於封膜等接觸商品內容之包裝部分、移除封條、拆除吊牌、拆除貼膠或標籤等情形)或已非全新狀態(外觀有刮傷、破損、受潮等)與包裝不完整(缺少商品、附件、原廠外盒、保護袋、配件紙箱、保麗龍、隨貨文件、贈品等)。
- 退貨程序請參閱【客服專區→常見問題→誠品線上退貨退款】之說明。